About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 251  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 56-60

Evaluation of lacrimal duct probing in adults with 0.02% and 0.04% mitomycin-C in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A randomized comparative pilot study


1 Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Manu Saini
Flat No. 261, Top Floor, Sector 11A, Chandigarh - 160 011
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_33_21

Rights and Permissions

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive use of mitomycin-C (MMC) using two different concentrations 0.2 mg/ml and 0.4 mg/ml for lacrimal duct probing to treat the nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective, an interventional comparative randomized pilot study of lacrimal duct probing conducted in the two study groups 0.02% MMC group (n = 30) and 0.04% MMC group (n = 30) in confirmed primary acquired NLDO of <1-year duration. Patency of lacrimal duct probing confirmed by syringing was compared at 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up in the two study groups, and corresponding subjective improvement of watering was appraised according to Kraft and Crawford grading. RESULTS: Patency of lacrimal duct probing in 0.02% MMC versus 0.04% MMC group was 66.66%/73.33% (P = 0.71) at 1 month, 46.66%/66.66% (P = 0.09) at 3 months and 46.66%/66.66% (P = 0.03) at 6-month follow-up, respectively. Subjective improvement of watering (no watering and mild watering) observed in 0.02% MMC versus 0.04% MMC group was 46.66%/73.33% (P = 0.03), at 1 month, 66.66%/83.33% (P = 0.13) at 3 months and 56.66%/73.33% (P = 0.17) at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Adult lacrimal duct probing with 0.04% MMC was associated with significant higher objective success rate than adult lacrimal duct probing with 0.02% MMC, without added concurrently side effects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed180    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal